AI, Analytics & Data Science: Towards Analytics Specialist

AI, Analytics & Data Science: Towards Analytics Specialist

Article 222 : Machine Learning With Statistical and Causal Methods in R for Engineering: An End-to-End Guide

Dr Nilimesh Halder's avatar
Dr Nilimesh Halder
Aug 28, 2025
∙ Paid
1
1
Share

This article explains how engineers can apply machine learning using both statistical and causal methods in R to build predictive models, uncover underlying mechanisms, and make more effective and actionable engineering decisions.

Article Outline

1. Introduction

  • Brief overview of the role of machine learning in engineering.

  • Importance of combining statistical and causal methods for robust engineering decision-making.

  • The distinction between predictive accuracy (statistical methods) and interpretability (causal methods).

2. Statistical Methods in Machine Learning for Engineering

  • Explanation of statistical foundations in ML (regression, hypothesis testing, probability distributions).

  • Commonly used statistical models in engineering applications (linear regression, logistic regression).

  • Advantages and limitations of statistical approaches.

3. Causal Methods in Machine Learning for Engineering

  • Introduction to causal inference and its relevance in engineering (understanding "why" not just "what").

  • Key causal techniques: randomized experiments, propensity score matching, instrumental variables, structural causal models.

  • Comparison of correlation vs. causation in engineering systems.

4. Integrating Statistical and Causal Methods

  • How statistical models provide predictive baselines while causal models uncover mechanisms.

  • Importance of combining both approaches for engineering projects (e.g., fault detection, process optimization).

  • Practical workflow: use statistical learning for prediction → use causal analysis for intervention planning.

5. End-to-End Example in R with Simulated Data

  • Step-by-step creation of a synthetic engineering dataset (e.g., machine performance, maintenance, and failure rates).

  • Application of statistical method: logistic regression to predict failure.

  • Application of causal method: propensity score matching to assess the causal effect of preventive maintenance.

  • Visualizations and interpretations of results.

  • Key lessons from integrating both approaches.

6. Case Study Applications in Engineering

  • Predictive maintenance in manufacturing.

  • Energy consumption optimisation in civil engineering.

  • Safety risk analysis in mechanical and electrical engineering.

  • Process improvements in chemical engineering.

7. Challenges and Considerations

  • Data quality and limitations in engineering datasets.

  • Computational trade-offs between predictive accuracy and causal interpretability.

  • Ethical and practical implications of causal inference in engineering decisions.

8. Conclusion

  • Summary of how statistical and causal methods complement each other in machine learning for engineering.

  • Future scope: hybrid approaches, causal discovery with machine learning, and explainable AI in engineering contexts.

1) Introduction

Engineering decisions often balance two needs: predictive accuracy (can we forecast failures, energy use, or yield?) and causal understanding (what interventions reduce failures, lower consumption, or increase yield?). Statistical machine learning excels at prediction, while causal methods estimate what happens if we change something. This article shows how to combine both in R, using clear, reproducible code for realistic engineering scenarios.

We’ll first contrast statistical and causal methods, then build a complete end‑to‑end example—predictive maintenance—before walking through four additional case studies:

  1. Predictive maintenance in manufacturing (binary failure prediction + causal effect of preventive maintenance).

  2. Energy consumption optimization in civil engineering (regression + causal effect of retrofit).

  3. Safety risk analysis in mechanical/electrical engineering (incident prediction + causal effect of safety training).

  4. Process improvement in chemical engineering (yield modeling + causal effect of catalyst switch).

Each section includes fully runnable R code. At the end, you’ll find all‑in‑one scripts that you can copy‑paste and run.

Subscribe to download the full article with codes … … …


AI, Analytics & Data Science: Towards Analytics Specialist is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to AI, Analytics & Data Science: Towards Analytics Specialist to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Nilimesh Halder
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture